Grammar-QuizzesVerb PhrasesVerb GroupsModals › Could vs. Should

Could vs. Should

Offer options and advice

lost wallet
 

 

Options and Advice — Could vs. Should

COULD

a little strengthCould expresses an idea, option or solution for someone else to take. Could does not express judgment about what is "right" to do. Could leaves the decision making to the other person. It can be used when the other person is [1] a peer (same status, rank, age), [2] is an acquaintance, [3] is greater in status (different rank, social level).

Oh no! My wallet isn't here in my bag.

MODAL PLAIN FORM VERB

You could

go back to where you last opened your bag and look around.

You could

walk back along the way you just walked.

You could

search the pockets of your bag / backpack.

You could

ask people if they have seen it.

SHOULD

strongerShould expresses opinion about a smart action for someone else to take. Should expresses advice about what is "good" to do. It is used to influence or affect the other person's decision-making. It is used in situations where the other person is [1] a peer (same status, rank, age) [2] is familiar (well known), [3] or is a family member.

Oh no! My wallet isn't here in my bag. (peer to peer)

MODAL PLAIN FORM VERB

You should

check the places you have been today.

You should

cancel your credit cards.

You should

notify campus security / police.

You should

arrange to get a new identification card.

 

 

acquaintance (N) – a person who in known but is not a close friend; a contact, an associate, a colleague, a neighbor,

advice (N, noncount ) – an opinion someone gives to another person about what they need to do to fix a problem; something with higher priority (need)

panic (N) – a sudden strong feeling of worry or fear

peer to peer (NP) – the relationship of two people who are of same rank, status, age (and possibly familiarity as in acquaintance vs. friend)

priority (N) – the situation of needing attention before all else (other things); thing of highest importance; The priority of a government is to take care of its people.

rank (N) – a relative position of standing (social, military, corporate,etc.); for example, subordinate vs. superior, junior vs. senior; people with higher rank are usually the decision-makers, persons-in-charge, responsible individuals.

status (N) – the relationship of one person to another in regards to social standing; for example, age (seniority), professional standing (student v. teacher, patient v. doctor, and possibly citizen v. government official / peace officer.

suggestion (N) – a helpful idea, plan, or possibility that someone mentions; He thoughtfully offered some suggestions.

N – noun; NP – noun phrase

 

 

 

 

Suggestions & Advice

Politeness — Status and Rank

 

Rank and Status — Could vs. Should

EMPLOYEE / ASSISTER(S)

a little strengthCould is a good choice for offering ideas to someone else who will be the decision maker, especially to someone of higher rank  (a boss) in the decision making process.                        

The electricity went off. What do we do? 

COULD

We could wait a few minutes to see if the power comes back on. Or we could go outside and work.

We don't have Internet access, but we could work outside and pick up access from the building next door.

We could take a break.  Perhaps, the power will be back in 30 minutes.

We could call the electricity company and complain.

BOSS / DECISION MAKER

strongerShould expresses what the speaker feels is morally right or most expedient or practical for the situation.  Should is used by the person who is the decision maker in a particular situation.

The electricity went off.

SHOULD

We should keep working.  Let's go outside for a while. Do we still have Internet access?

OK. Let's try that. If the power doesn't come back on within an hour, you all should work from home.

No. We need to get this done before noon. We should keep on working.

the strongestI can call them, but it probably won't do any good.  They really must do something about these constant power outages.

 

expedient  (Adj) – fit or suitable for the purpose; producing the desired result; proper under the circumstances

practical (Adj) – useful, logical, realistic

 

 

 

 

Questions, Hypotheticals, Hesitators — Employee vs. Boss

EMPLOYEE / ASSISTER(S)

Using question forms (Do you think, Why don't we, etc.), past tense modal forms (could, might) and "hesitators" (possibly, perhaps, maybe, etc.) makes it clear that the speaker is not trying to take the position of decision maker.

OTHER WORDING

weakDo you think we ought to wait a few minutes to see if the power comes back on? Or we perhaps could go outside and work.

weakWe don't have Internet access, but I suppose we could work outside and pick up WiFi from the building next door.

a little strongerWhy don't we take our lunch break earlier.  Perhaps, the power will be back in 30 minutes.

weakYou might want to call the electricity company and complain.

BOSS / DECISION MAKER

Using semi-modals such as had better and ought to express stronger judgment, yet less than using must.  See Modal Review a comparison from weak to strong: could to must.                                                                        

OTHER WORDING

strongerWe ought to keep working.  Let's go outside for a while. Do we still have Internet access?

strongerOK. Let's try that. If the power doesn't come back on within an hour, you all will have to work from home.

strongerNo. We need to get this done before noon. We had better keep on working.

the strongestI can call them, but it probably won't do any good.  They really need to do something about these constant power outages.

 

Also see Ought to  and Had Better

Relative strength and weakness depends on tone of voice, body language, and other social circumstances.

 

 

 

 

► Show Grammar Notes and Works Cited ▼ Hide Grammar Notes

Grammar Notes (Advanced)

Traditional and Linguistic Description

 

 

Traditional / ESL and Linguistic Descriptions

TRADITIONAL & ESL LINGUISTIC
AZAR HUDDLESTON

could expresses a weak degree of certainty  (may, might, could) (Azar 10.1-4)

  • possibility
    • modal → He could be sick.   (possibility – 50% degree of certainty);
    • past modal modal → He could have been sick.   (possibility – < 50% degree of certainty)
    • negative modal → He couldn't be sick.   (possibility – 99% degree of certainty)
  • past modal Tom could lift the box. Tom said he could speak French.  (ability)
  • polite request Could you help me?
  • suggestion (an option; one of several ideas) →  You could ask a different doctor. (20-4)

should expresses advisability and 90% certainty (expectation)

  • certainty/expectation → She should have done better. (should, ought to, had better) (10-4)
  • advisability → I should study.  I should have studied. (past) ranges from a suggestion to statement about responsibility or duty
  • in conditionals → If any one should call, let me know. (in a conditional statement to indicate less certainty)
  • in reported speech → He said that I should call them.

 

can / could  "Mood and Modality" ( 3 §9)

  • possibility (epistemic) → weak commitment → He can't have done it.(neg. only) / He could be the killer. [possibility]
  • possibility (deontic ) → He can have one more cookie. [permission]
  • possibility (dynamic) (3 §9.3.3)
    • You can always say "no". [reasonable/ acceptable]
    • Rain can get in. [circumstantial possibility]
    • Dogs can bite. [existential]
    • He could set a record today. [potential ability]
    • He can / could speak Swahili. [actualized ability]
  • backshift → He said he could speak Swahili. [actualized ability]  He thought that Valjean could be the killer. [possibility]
  • polite form–distancing ("modally remote preterit") → Could you help me?  (3 §9.8.3)
     

should expresses medium strength modality  (Huddleston 3 §9.4) 
medium strength = probable, likely, appear, seem

  • possibility (epistemic) → The train should come at noon. [probably]
  • necessity (deontic) → One should always tell the truth.  We should leave soon.

epistemic – what the speaker believes is probable; likelihood based on inference
deontic – what the speaker feels is right morally or feels is right for the sake of expediency (3 §9.2.2)
 

SWAN BIBER

can/ could  (Swan 123-5)

  • ability
    • presentI can read Italian. (knowledge, skill, strength)  
    • past →  I could read quickly.  He said he could read Italian. (past)
  • common or typical → It can be hot here in summer.
  • possible in the situationWe can go to Athens.
  • soft suggestionWe could try a different approach.
  • unrealized pastWe could have gone to Athens, but we didn't
  • chances (possibility) → It could rain this afternoon. (122.8)
  • permissionCould we have some cake?  (more polite than can) (124)
  • requests, orders, and suggestionsCould we have some cake?  (124.6)
  • criticismYou could have told me you were dating my girl.
  • indirect speechI asked if they could give me some help. 

 

should (518-21)

  • obligationsEveryone should wear seat belts. (It's good or important to do.)  (should, ought)
  • probabilityHe should arrive soon. (It is logical or normal.)  
  • pastI thought I should call him. (within a clause) 
  • past events that did not happenI should have called him, but I forgot.
  • in case → Should you need help, please call.
  • It's important/surprising that… shouldIt's surprising that you should say that.

 

can / could (Biber 6.6.4.1)

permission / possibility / ability: can, could, may, might 

Could and might are much more common expressing logical possibility than permission or ability.

In contrast to the typical functions of can, the modal could usually marks logical possibility in conversation, expressing a greater degree of uncertainty or tentativeness.  That could be her.  It could be anything you choose.

Epistemic Stance.modal Verb in extrinsic sense Without… collaboration there could be interference… (Biber 973)

 

should  ( 6.6.4.2) 

obligation / necessity: must, should, had better, have (got) to, need to ought to, be supposed to

Each modal can have two types of meaning:

  • intrinsic actions and events that humans (or other agents) control directly: permission, obligation, volition (or intention)
  • extrinsic logical status of events or states; assessments of likelihood: possibility, necessity, or prediction

 

 

 

Works Cited

  • Azar, Betty Schrampfer, and Stacy A. Hagen. Understanding and Using English Grammar. 4th ed., Pearson Education, 2009.
  • Biber, Douglas, and Stig Johansson, et al. Longman Grammar Of Spoken And Written English. Pearson Education, 1999.
  • Huddleston, Rodney D., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge UP, 2002.
  • Swan, Michael. Practical English Usage. 3rd ed., Oxford UP, 2005.

 

 

 

 

Practice 1

Offering Solutions

light switch
 

 

My electricity bill was too high. How can I save money?  

  1. Select the response from the list that best completes the sentence. 
  2. Compare your response to the feedback by clicking the "Check" or the "Check 1-6" button.

 

1.

2.

3.

4.
(seal (V) – close)

5.

6.

 

 

 

 

 

Practice 2

Offering Solutions

gas pump
 

 

Gas costs too much.  I can't afford to fill my car anymore! 

  1. Select the response from the list that best completes the sentence. 
  2. Compare your response to the feedback by clicking the "Check" or the "Check 6-10" button.

 

7.

8.

9.

10.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Practice 3

Offering Solutions

car wreck
 

 

I had a car accident.  My car is wrecked.  I can't go to work. 

  1. Select the response from the list that best completes the sentence. 
  2. Compare your response to the feedback by clicking the "Check" or the "Check 11-15" button.

 

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.