FANBOYS is an acronym made from the first letter of each connector word below.
Before you begin, make sure that you know about an independent clause.
| COORDINATORS | ||
|---|---|---|
A coordinator joins like elements, such as, noun phrases, verb phrases, and so on. The coordinator expresses the relationship between the two elements, such as, reason (for) conjunction (and) negation (nor) contrast (but) disjunction (or) unexpected outcome (yet) result (so). |
||
| CONNECTOR | CLAUSE 1 | CLAUSE 2 |
FOR |
He couldn't go home. |
He had no place to go. |
AND |
I took a taxi. |
She drove home. |
NOR |
He didn't want help. |
He didn't ask for it |
BUT |
I wanted to go late. |
She wanted to go on time. |
OR |
She cooked dinner. |
He took her out to a restaurant. |
YET |
She owned a car. |
She didn't know how to drive it. |
SO |
She had to go. |
She called a friend to drive her. |
| CLAUSES |
|---|
A coordinator may coordinate parts of a clause (subclausal) or it may coordinate two independent clauses. In traditional grammar, the clause following the coordinator is called a dependent clause. In linguistic description, the clauses are coordinates of the coordinator. |
| COMPOUND SENTENCE / COORDINATE CLAUSES |
He couldn't go home , for¹ he had no place to go. |
I took a taxi , and she drove home. |
He didn't want help, nor did he ask for it. |
I wanted to go late, but she wanted to go on time. |
She cooked dinner, or he took her out to a restaurant. |
She owned a car, yet she didn't know how to drive it. |
She had to go, so she called a friend to drive her. |
¹for as a connector, is not commonly used in American English
like (adj.) – alike, having similary qualities or characteristics
Also see Grammar Notes , Punctuation and Subject / Predicate.
| COORDINATED ELEMENTS | ||
|---|---|---|
A coordinator joins like elements from various categories: two nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, adjective phrases, adverb phrases, prepositional phrases, noun phrases, etc. |
||
| ELEMENT A | COORD. | ELEMENT B |
She waved a hand (NP) |
and |
a fan. (NP) |
She played the piano (VP) |
but |
preferred dancing. ( VP) |
Did she play in the evening ( PP) |
or |
in the afternoon? ( PP) |
| COORDINATED CLAUSES | ||
|---|---|---|
A coordinator may also join two clauses that are closely related (share a common idea). In traditional grammar, this is called an independent clause. In linguistic description, this is called a nonfinite clause. |
||
| CLAUSE A | COORD. | CLAUSE B |
She waved a hand (CL) |
, and |
she waved a fan. (CL) |
She played the piano (CL) |
, but |
we preferred dancing. (CL) |
Did she play in the afternoon (CL) |
, or |
did John play in the afternoon? (CL) |
*The subject may be understood as in a command: Go! See sentence details.
See Grammar Notes (below) for various terms.
| TWO INDEPENDENT CLAUSES SPECIFICALLY RELATED |
|---|
|
| COMMA |
Jack took a taxi, and Anne drove home. / Jack took a taxi and Anne drove home. |
Jack didn't want help, nor did he ask for it. |
Jack wanted to go late, but Anne wanted to go on time. |
Anne had to go, so she called a friend to
drive her home. |
| TWO INDEPENDENT CLAUSES SOMEHOW RELATED |
|---|
|
| SEMICOLON |
Jack took a taxi; Anne drove home. (addition) |
Jack didn't want help; he didn't ask for it. (negative addition) |
Jack wanted to go late; Anne wanted to go on time. (contrast) |
Anne had to go; she called a friend to
drive her home. (result) |
comma use – "In coordination, punctuation is commonly used to separate one coordinate from the next. The comma is the default mark; under certain conditions, however, a semicolon (but not a colon) is used instead… CaGEL (20 §3.2.1)
"Usually a comma immediately precedes the conjunction" (Azar 16-4)
heavy vs. light punctuation — For some writers, this commas use is an example of "heavy" punctuation. These writers opt for "light" punctuation– no commas. (CaGEL 1727, 1746) (PEU 510.4)
Also see commas usage in Comma Series.
| EQUAL |
|---|
A coordination is a relation between elements of equal status; they must be syntactically alike. A coordinator joins like elements. (CaGEL 15.2.1.b) |
| COORDINATOR |
We went to a show, but Anne didn't feel well. clause + clause |
|
Anne called a taxi, and she left. clause + clause |
|
| UNEQUAL |
|---|
A subordinator can join elements that are not grammatically alike. (before, after, when, while) |
| SUBORDINATOR |
Anne had a headache when arriving. *clause + gerund |
Anne had a headache when she arrived. clause + clause |
Anne called a taxi before leaving. *clause + gerund |
Anne called a taxi before she left. clause + clause |
*nonfinite clause + finite clause (linguistic term)
| MID-POSITION CONNECTOR |
|---|
A coordinator or a subordinator may be placed between two like elements or structures. However, "a coordinator and its coordinate cannot be moved to front position." (CaGEL 15.2.1.d) |
| COORDINATOR |
Anne wanted leave the theater early, but we wanted to stay. |
Anne wanted to leave the theater, so she called a taxi. |
Anne wanted to leave, yet she stayed and watched the end of the show. |
Anne stayed until the end of the show, for she didn't want to upset us. |
| SUBORDINATOR |
Anne wanted to leave though the show hadn't ended. |
Anne wanted to leave because she had a headache. |
Anne called a taxi before she left the theater. (because, though, before, etc.) |
Anne called a taxi when the show ended. (at the moment that)
|
| INITIAL-POSITION CONNECTOR |
|---|
A subordinator and its subordinate clause may be moved to "front position". This is a property of a subordintor not a coordinator; therefore, for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so are not like subordinators in this aspect. |
| COORDINATOR |
*But we wanted to stay, Anne wanted to leave. |
*So she called a taxi, Anne wanted to leave. |
*Yet she stayed and talked, Anne wanted to leave. |
*For she didn't want to upset us, Anne stayed until the end of the show. |
| SUBORDINATOR |
Though the show hadn't ended, Anne wanted to leave. |
Because she had a headache, Anne wanted to leave. |
Before she left the theater, Anne called a taxi. |
When the show ended, Anne called a taxi.
|
Coordinators do not permit "fronting". (CaGEL 15.2.1.d)
? borderline usage (requires special context) / * not used
theatre (BrEng) theater (USEng)
| CLAUSE A + CLAUSE B |
|---|
The elements joined by a coordinator are reversible (except so, for and yet). That is, the order of the coordinates (clauses) does not affect meaning (interpretation or acceptability.) |
| COORDINATOR |
Anne wanted to leave, for it was late. (for – reason) |
Anne wanted leave, and we wanted to stay. |
Anne didn't want to walk, nor did she want to take a taxi. |
Anne wanted leave, but we wanted to stay. |
Anne wanted to walk, or she wanted to take a taxi. |
Anne wanted leave early, yet she stayed late. |
Anne wanted to leave, so she called a taxi. |
| SUBORDINATOR |
Anne called a taxi before she left. (After/ Before/ When, etc.) |
Anne walked though she was tired. |
Anne called a taxi because she needed to leave. (Because / though) |
| CLAUSE B + CLAUSE A |
|---|
The elements joined by a subordinator are not reversible. That is, the order of the clauses affects the interpretation or makes the sentence unacceptable. → Note that for, so, and yet are like subordinators in this aspect. |
| COORDINATOR |
*It was late, for she wanted to leave. |
Anne wanted to stay, and we wanted leave. |
Anne didn't want to take a taxi, nor did she want to walk. |
We wanted to stay, but Anne wanted to leave. |
Anne wanted to take a taxi, or she wanted to walk. |
?Anne stayed late, yet she wanted to leave early. |
*Anne called a taxi, so she wanted to leave. |
| SUBORDINATOR |
*Anne left before she called a taxi. |
*Anne was tired though she walked. |
*Anne needed to leave because she called a taxi. |
? borderline usage (requires special context) / * not used
| FOCUS | SOLUTION |
|---|---|
*We went food shopping, and bought dinner. (clause + phrase)
*We bought meat, and vegetables. (noun + noun) |
We went food shopping and bought dinner. We went food shopping, and we bought dinner. We bought meat and vegetables. A comma is not placed before and when joining two similar sentence elements (verb phrases, noun phrases, adjective phrases, adverb phrases, etc.).
|
*We went food shopping and he washed the car. (clause + clause) Place a comma before "and" when joining two independent clauses – both elements have a subject and a verb.
|
We went food shopping, and he washed the car. (comma + and) A comma is placed before and when joining two independent clauses that are closely related in meaning. |
We bought meat, vegetables, and fruit. (OK – items in a series) |
We bought meat, vegetables and fruit We bought meat, vegetables, and fruit. (the Oxford comma)
|
*Leave your luggage with your responsibility. (?)
|
You may leave your luggage, but it is your responsibility to watch it.
|

An old cage with five puppies was left outside of an Oklahoma animal shelter but the animal shelter was overcrowded and the puppies were very weak. There was no more room for five puppies so they had to euthanize (kill) them.
All of the puppies except one died. In fact, they euthanized one puppy twice but he wouldn't die so instead they decided he was a miracle puppy and found him a good home!
| MID-SENTENCE | AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SENTENCE |
|---|---|
For some writers, a coordinator (and, but, so, or, yet) is only used between two independent clauses (separated by a comma.) That is, a "conjunction" is not used at the beginning of a sentence. Grammarians (scholars in language use) do not support this restricted use. (See comments below.) |
For other writers, including journalists and academic writers, a coordinator or "conjunction" is used both between two clauses and at the beginning of a sentence. Read the comments below from well-known grammarians. |
The animal shelter was overcrowded, and the puppies were very weak. |
The animal shelter was overcrowded. And the puppies were very weak. (emphasis) |
There was no more room for five puppies, so they had to euthanize them. kill |
There was no more room for five puppies. So they had to euthanize them. (emphasis) |
They euthanized one puppy twice, but he wouldn't die. (contrast) |
They euthanized one puppy twice. But he wouldn't die. (emphasis) |
The vet decided he was a miracle puppy, and he found him a good home! |
So the vet decided he was a miracle puppy. And he found him a good home! |
Pop-Q "but" | The miracle puppy's story.
| TRADITIONAL GRAMMAR | LINGUISTIC DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
In traditional grammar, a conjunction and a coordinating conjunction differ in that a conjunction joins grammatically alike subclausal elements, whereas a coordinating conjunction joins grammatically alike clausal elements. (Azar ) (PEU 510.1-2) |
In linguistic description, "coordination is the relation between elements of equal syntactic status, and as such contrast with subordination [unequal syntactic structure]." (CaGEL "Properties of prototypical coordinators" 15 §2.1) |
conjunction – is a term for a word that joins two like elements, such as nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, or phrases (but not clauses).
|
conjunction – is a logic function of A + B "both"; ("and" and sometimes "or") Caffeine is found in coffee and tea. Caffeine is found in coffee or tea. ("both"). |
coordinating conjunctions —for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so — join independent clauses. The resulting construction is a compound sentence.
|
coordinators — and, but, or, and nor— join a variety of syntactically alike structures both subclausal (NP, VP, AdjP, Adv, etc.P) and clausal. symmetric constructions – He got up and he poured some coffee. (Clause + Clause) conditional constructions with and – Look at it and you'll see what I mean. (CaGEL 15 §2.2.2.4) |
yet and so – In traditional grammar, yet and so are coordinating conjunctions. In linguistic description, they are connective adverbs, but they may be regarded as "marginal members of the coordinator category" when used in combination with a coordinator: He took a taxi, and so he arrived early. He took a taxi, and yet he arrived late. (CaGEL 15 §2.10) |
connective adverbs — so (result) and yet (contrary to expectation)— join a subordinate clause which may be of unequal syntactic status; do not allow reversible clause position; and may be fronted. (CaGEL 15 §2.10) for, only and so+that are borderline connectors / prepositions (which take clausal complements) Huddleston and Pullum (CaGEL) call them "problematic". He called a taxi, for he wanted to go home; He wanted to call a taxi, only (except) he had no phone number; He called a taxi, so that he could go home. (CaGEL 15 §2.11) |
compound sentence– In traditional grammar, the joining of two independent clauses is called a compound sentence. |
In current linguistic description, "compound" is limited to the joining of two words: sweetheart, blackbird, copycat, egghead, socio-economic, etc.) See Hyphens compounds. |
CATEGORIES: NP –noun phrase; N – noun; VP – verb phrase; V – verb; PP – prepositional phrase; P – preposition; AdvP – adverb phrase; Adv – adverb; AdjP– adjective phrase; Adj – adjective: Clause – nonfinite / finite
and. 3 There is a persistent belief that it is improper to begin a sentence with And, but this prohibition has been cheerfully ignored by standard authors from Anglo-Saxon times onwards. An initial And is a useful aid to writers as the narrative continues. The OED provides examples from the 9c. to the 19c. ... — Fowler's Modern English Usage (52)
but. 2 Used at the beginning of a sentence. The widespread public belief that But should not be used at the beginning of a sentence seems to be unshakable. Yet it has no foundation. In certain kinds of compound sentences, but is used to introduce a balancing statement of the nature of an exception, objection, limitation or contrast to what has gone before; sometimes, in its weakest form, merely expressing disconnection, or emphasizing the introduction of a distinct or independent fact. In such circumstances, but is most commonly placed after a semi-colon, but it can legitimately be placed at the beginning of a sentence and frequently is. — Fowler's Modern English Usage (121)
and 1. Everybody agrees that it's all right to begin a sentence with and, and nearly everybody admits to having been taught at some time in the past that the practice was wrong. Most of us think the prohibition goes back to our early school days. Bailey 1984 points out that the prohibition is probably meant to correct the tendency of children to string together independent clause or simple declarative sentences with ands... — Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (93)
but 1. Part of the folklore of usage is the belief that there something wrong in beginning a sentence with but: "Many of us were taught that no sentence should begin with but. If that's what you learned, unlearn it — there is no stronger word at the start. It announces total contrast with what has gone before, and the reader is primed for the change." — Zinsser 1976 (Several more quotes and examples are included.) — Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage ( 211)
Beginning a sentence with a conjunction. There is a widespread belief — one with no historical or grammatical foundation — that it is an error to begin a sentence with a conjunction such as and, but, or so. In fact, a substantial percentage (often as many as 10 percent) of the sentences in first-rate writing begin with conjunctions. It has been so for centuries, and even the most conservative grammarians have followed this practice. Charles Allen Lloyd's 1938 words fairly sum up the situation as it stands even today: "Next to the groundless notion that it is incorrect to end an English sentence with a preposition, perhaps the most wide-spread of the many false beliefs about the use of our language is the equally groundless notion that it is incorrect to begin one with 'but' or 'and'. — The Chicago Manual of Style (5.191)
Beginning a sentence with and or some other coordinating conjunction (but, or or nor) can be an effective means—if not overused— of giving special attention to the thought that follows the conjunction. No comma should follow the conjunction at the start of a new sentence unless a parenthetical element occurs at that point. (Gregg 1101)
I heard news on the radio about a fire and my family saw it on the television. They said it was caused by an exploding computer but I didn't understand how. The fire chief called in all his men but he ordered them to stay back. The building became engulfed in flames so they stood by. The police wanted to inspect the scene of the fire and the fire chief did too. They needed to examine everything for they did not think it was an accident.
The police could not find the source of the fire nor could the fire chief. Either someone set the fire or caused the fire accidentally so they brought in the K-9 unit. Not only did the dogs find the source of the fire but they also found the burned-out computer. The fire chief wanted to close the case yet the police asked to keep it open.
They said – "they" is an example of impersonal pronoun use.
call in (v.) – order to come (to a work location)
engulfed (adj.) – surrounded, covered
inspect the scene (v.) – examine, look very carefully at the details where something happened
source (n.) – the cause of something, the place where it starts
set fire (v.p.) – start a fire; set the fire (past tense) started the fire
K-9 unit – a special canine (dog) search team
close the case (v.p.) – officially end the investigation, end the search for the cause
NP –noun phrase; VP – verb phrase; AdvP – adverb phrase; AdjP– adjective phrase; PP – prepositional phrase; Cls – clause (independent / nonfinite)